Blog

Introduction

Messaging apps are no longer just tools for casual conversation — they’re platforms for business communication, community engagement, customer service, and, increasingly, a battleground for privacy, national policy and user trust. Two names that have captured attention recently are WhatsApp, the decades-old global incumbent owned by Meta, and Arattai, a newer “made-in-India” messaging app developed with a strong privacy and local-data emphasis. This long-form comparison unpacks their histories, feature sets, privacy/security models, developer philosophies, business use cases, migration considerations, and what each means for organizations thinking about messaging strategy in 2025.

TL;DR: WhatsApp remains the feature-rich, globally adopted platform with mature end-to-end encryption and a deep ecosystem; Arattai is an emerging, India-focused alternative that emphasizes local data storage and a simple UX — and is rapidly iterating to close capability gaps (especially encryption for text) that matter to privacy-conscious users and enterprises.

1. Origins & Positioning

WhatsApp launched in 2009 and grew into the world’s largest messaging app, later acquired by Meta. Its position today is as a global, platform-agnostic messaging and communications service used by individuals, small businesses and enterprises alike. Over the years WhatsApp has added features beyond 1:1 chat — groups, channels, voice/video calling, business APIs, document sharing, and more — alongside continual UI and feature tweaks. Recent official product roundups show WhatsApp keeps expanding functionality for channels, group management, calls, and creative content tools.

Arattai (stylized in some places as “Aratai” / Arattai) is a newer player built as an Indian-made messaging app. Positioned as a simple, privacy-conscious alternative, it promises core chat features (text, voice notes, audio/video calls), stories, groups and channels. Arattai quickly captured attention in India due to national sentiment, ease of use, and active promotion; it briefly surged in app store rankings as downloads spiked. The app’s public messaging emphasizes local data residency and a clean experience for friends/families.

2. Feature Comparison — What You Can Do

Below is a functional comparison of the most commonly used features for consumers and businesses.

Messaging (text, media, files)

• WhatsApp: Supports robust 1:1 and group chat, rich media (images, video, live/motion photos), document sharing, message search, quoted replies, reactions, disappearing messages, and advanced chat privacy options. It supports message backup (encrypted options available) and cross-device use.
• Arattai: Offers text messaging, voice notes, image/video sharing, documents, and group chats. It focuses on simplicity and usability; however, as of recent public reporting, some messaging encryption features (for standard messages) were still listed as under development or available only through a “secret chat” mode, with voice/video calls already end-to-end encrypted.

Voice & Video Calls

• WhatsApp: High-quality voice and video calls with group calling support; calls are end-to-end encrypted by default.
• Arattai: Supports audio and video calls with end-to-end encryption for calls (Zoho/Arattai has stated they encrypt voice/video). Text-message encryption parity is still being rolled out or limited to special modes depending on the version.

Groups, Channels & Community Features

• WhatsApp: Mature group features (admins, group settings), Channels for broadcast-style updates, and business-focused features like catalogs and interactive messages. WhatsApp continually adds group and channel functionality.
• Arattai: Also offers groups and channels-like constructs suitable for communities and family groups; emphasis is on lightweight, low-friction interaction for social circles.

Business & Integration

• WhatsApp: Robust business ecosystem — WhatsApp Business App and WhatsApp Business API enable catalogs, CRM integrations, customer support flows, templated notifications and automation across many third-party platforms. This makes WhatsApp attractive for commerce and customer service.
• Arattai: As a newer player, Arattai’s business tooling is nascent compared to WhatsApp. Expect faster evolution if demand from SMEs and local enterprises grows, but today WhatsApp retains the clear lead for business integrations.

3. Privacy & Security — The Crux of the Debate

Security posture and data handling are often the decisive factors for enterprises and privacy-conscious users. Below we compare the core privacy/security aspects.

End-to-End Encryption (E2EE)

• WhatsApp: Uses end-to-end encryption (Signal protocol) for personal messages and calls — meaning message contents are intended to be accessible only to sender and receiver, not WhatsApp/Meta. This E2EE extends to most chat content by default.
• Arattai: Public statements and independent reporting indicate Arattai encrypts voice and video calls end-to-end; however, as of recent reporting, standard text messages did not have full E2EE by default across the platform (though “secret chat” options and full encryption roadmaps are mentioned). Zoho has highlighted that messaging encryption is under development and aims to deliver parity. This gap is a focal point for privacy analysts.

Data Residency and Metadata

• WhatsApp: Meta’s infrastructure spans globally; WhatsApp stores some metadata (e.g., account info, logs, certain device and usage metadata) and may respond to lawful requests by local authorities where applicable — though content is protected by E2EE. For details on how government/data requests are handled, see WhatsApp’s help/FAQ resources.
• Arattai: Emphasizes local data storage and operating under Indian jurisdiction, which appeals to users seeking domestic control over data. Local hosting and an explicitly “Indian” brand promise ease concerns over cross-border flow of certain user data, but the absence of full text E2EE at launch tempers the privacy headline.

Transparency & Auditability

• WhatsApp: Has published documentation on encryption and security practices; the underlying Signal protocol has been audited and publicly discussed, though WhatsApp’s broader software is not fully open-source.
• Arattai: Zoho’s approach is to position Arattai as privacy-first and to respond to local concerns; however, market analysts and privacy advocates have urged transparent audits and public disclosures to build trust as it scales.

4. Adoption, Trust & Ecosystem Effects

User Base & Network Effects
WhatsApp’s primary strength is its global user base and the network effect: because “everyone’s on WhatsApp,” switching costs are high. Businesses choose WhatsApp because that’s where customers already are, and third-party vendors provide integration services. Conversely, Arattai’s early surge in downloads — driven by “swadeshi” sentiment and local endorsements — shows that a compelling local narrative plus solid UX can produce rapid adoption spikes. But sustained growth depends on whether Arattai can retain users by matching core features and addressing security questions.

Developer & Third-Party Ecosystem
WhatsApp’s API and partner ecosystem (CRM connectors, bots, commerce plugins) are mature. Arattai will need to build developer tooling and partner programs to win enterprise trust and workflows; this takes time and clear product/SDK roadmaps.

Brand & Policy Risk
Platform governance, moderation policies, and how apps respond to misinformation, spam, and state directives matter. WhatsApp has increasingly invested in channel moderation tools and notice systems; Arattai will need a defensible moderation policy as scale increases.

5. Performance, Usability & Accessibility

Low-bandwidth Performance
Both apps aim to work in varied network conditions. Arattai markets itself as optimized for low-connectivity areas — a useful differentiator in regions with patchy connectivity. WhatsApp, with years of refinement, offers strong performance too, and continues adding features like message search, live/motion photo support, and document scanning to improve day-to-day usability.

Cross-Platform Support
WhatsApp supports mobile, web, and multi-device use; it keeps adding multi-device improvements. Arattai supports Android and iOS and promotes cross-platform simplicity; desktop/web parity is typically a roadmap item for apps at this stage.

6. Business Use Cases & Recommendations

If your organization is evaluating which platform to adopt or support, here are practical considerations and scenarios.

Customer Support & Commerce

• WhatsApp: Best-in-class today. Use WhatsApp Business API for order confirmations, notifications, two-way support, catalogs, and structured messaging. Strong vendor ecosystem makes integration with CRM and ticketing systems straightforward.
• Arattai: Could be attractive for India-first services wanting a local alternative, especially for communities preferring domestic apps. However, if heavy automation, templated messaging, or existing CRM integrations are required today, WhatsApp is the lower-risk choice.

Internal Communications

• For internal teams, both apps could work; but sensitive internal comms should rely on platforms with guaranteed E2EE and audited security controls — WhatsApp’s default encryption has an advantage, though organizations should also consider enterprise-class alternatives (Microsoft Teams, Slack with E2EE options, Signal for privacy-critical work).

Compliance & Data Sovereignty

• Arattai’s explicit local-data posture could simplify regulatory conversations for Indian entities concerned about cross-border data transfers. If local hosting and compliance with Indian laws are decisive, Arattai’s positioning is an advantage — provided the product meets encryption and auditing expectations.
• WhatsApp has mechanisms and documentation for legal requests and data handling internationally; organizations must map WhatsApp’s data practices to their compliance needs (retention, legal holds, privacy notices).

Migration Strategy
If you plan to offer support on both platforms:

1. Prioritize WhatsApp for immediate reach and integrations.
2. Pilot Arattai for specific regional audiences or beta community experiments, especially where local-data messaging is valued.
3. Monitor feature parity (encryption, API availability, group/channel tools) and be prepared to pivot as Arattai matures.

7. Where They Differ Most — A Quick Checklist

• Encryption default for text messages: WhatsApp — yes (E2EE by default). Arattai — voice/video encrypted; text E2EE under development / limited.
• Global scale & ecosystem: WhatsApp leads; Arattai is nascent but growing.
• Data residency narrative: Arattai emphasizes India-first, local storage; WhatsApp stores metadata across infrastructure and handles requests according to its policies and local laws.
• Business integrations & API maturity: WhatsApp is mature; Arattai is early-stage.
• User trust drivers: WhatsApp’s long-standing E2EE + global adoption; Arattai’s appeal is local autonomy, simplicity and a rapidly growing user base.

8. Risks, Unknowns & What to Watch

Encryption roadmap for Arattai. The single most critical technical issue for privacy-focused adoption is whether and when Arattai delivers default, audited text E2EE across the platform. Zoho’s public materials and current reporting describe a roadmap for encryption parity; organizations should track official releases and independent audits.

Policy & moderation scaling. Rapid growth brings spam, scams, and misinformation. Both platforms will need strong abuse controls; WhatsApp has programs in place, whereas Arattai will need to develop scalable moderation and reporting tools as adoption grows.

Regulatory pressures. Messaging platforms worldwide face regulation (data residency, traceability, content takedown requests). Arattai’s India-first architecture may help with regulatory alignment locally, but also means Arattai will be subject to Indian law enforcement/requests; WhatsApp faces similar tensions globally and documents its handling of such requests.

9. Practical Guidance for Organizations

1. If you need reach and integrations now — pick WhatsApp. It’s the pragmatic choice for businesses that need immediate access to customers, CRM integrations, and a stable API landscape.
2. If your priority is data residency and local sovereignty — evaluate Arattai closely. Run pilots focused on low-risk communications, measure feature parity, and insist on encryption timelines and audit transparency.
3. For privacy-critical communications — require audited E2EE and explicit guarantees. Don’t rely on marketing claims; require security whitepapers, third-party audits, and clear data-handling contracts.
4. Hybrid approach: Many organizations will support multiple channels. Use WhatsApp for core customer interactions and experiment with Arattai for community engagement, local campaigns, or where a “made-in” message resonates.

10. Future Outlook

The messaging market is dynamic. WhatsApp will likely continue expanding with features (AI-assisted experiences, richer media, improved group tools) while retaining its security positioning. Arattai’s rapid adoption surge shows there’s appetite for local alternatives — if Zoho (or Arattai’s maintainers) delivers full encryption, robust moderation tools and business APIs, Arattai could become a meaningful challenger — at least regionally. Market outcomes will depend on execution, trust-building (through transparency and audits), and the evolving regulatory landscape in India and beyond.

Conclusion — Which Should You Choose?

• Choose WhatsApp if: you need immediate global reach, mature business tooling, and the reassurance of default end-to-end encryption for most chat content.
• Choose Arattai if: local data residency, a Made-in-India stance, and supporting an emerging domestic ecosystem are strategic priorities — and you’re comfortable piloting while critical features (like default text E2EE and enterprise APIs) roll out.

Both platforms have a role to play. For most businesses today, a pragmatic posture is “support WhatsApp now, pilot Arattai where it makes sense, and revisit as Arattai matures.” Keep a sharp eye on encryption parity, APIs, and audit reports — those will be the true signals of readiness for enterprise adoption.